How is a system like this allowed to operate in our democracy? The credit bureaus have placed themselves in the position of both judge and jury in relation to your credit file. Do not forget one very important difference… A judge will give you a chance to defend yourself before ruling. We are supposed to have the opportunity in America to face our accusers before judgment is passed. This is entirely untrue when it comes to your credit records.
The truth is creditors and credit bureaus have been swapping information about you behind your back and without your permission for a long time. In effect, it is hearsay and it can cause you severe economic hardship.
The current system does not give you the opportunity to defend yourself before inscribing your credit file with negative and damaging information (even if it is not yours). Their perspective is that you must prove to them that the negative information on your credit report is incorrect, invalid, erroneous, or otherwise non-verifiable before they will remove it. In other words, in the eyes of the credit bureaus… you are guilty until proven innocent.
We are brought up to believe that one is innocent until proven guilty. Why we are not extended the same courtesy by the credit bureaus? Why do they not give us a chance to defend ourselves before they place negative information on our report? Fact is, consumer rights cost them money.
|